Lok Sabha Approves Amaravati as Andhra Pradesh Capital Amid YSRCP Walkout

The Lok Sabha (the lower house of Parliament) has approved the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation (Amendment) Bill of 2026, and with this approval, Amaravati is officially designated as the capital of Andhra Pradesh. The YSRCP party left the debate before the vote, and the bill now needs to be approved by the Rajya Sabha (the upper house) to be finalized. It's expected that Amaravati will be legally a capital as of June t2, 2024.

Essentially, the bill changes Section 5 of the 2014 Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act. The original act vaguely mentioned a future capital, but the amendment specifically names Amaravati as the new capital.

What the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation (Amendment) Bill, 2026 changes

This goes back to 2014, when Hyderabad was to be a shared capital for both Telangana and Andhra Pradesh for up to ten years. After ten years, Hyderabad would become solely Telangana’s and Andhra Pradesh would have to create its own capital.

The bill confirms in writing that Amaravati is Andhra Pradesh’s capital from June 2, 2024. The state had already chosen and announced Amaravati and has already begun some administrative and infrastructure work.

Nityanand Rai, Minister of State for Home, introduced and got the bill passed. The state government also mentioned that the Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly had passed a resolution on March 28th asking Parliament to officially call Amaravati the capital in the national law.

Most politicians, from different parties, supported the main idea of the bill, as they believe clearly stating the capital will end the long period of not knowing where the government will be. Manickam Tagore of the Congress party said his party supports the bill, but he wants the central government to provide money for the capital project, and for Andhra Pradesh to be given “special category” status (which brings extra benefits).

Broad support in the Lok Sabha, with demands attached

Tagore believes developing Amaravati is part of a larger plan for the state to grow. He wants the central government to give a lot of support, but also to work on improving cities like Visakhapatnam, Tirupati, and Kurnool at the same time.

Chandra Sekhar Pemmasani, a TDP (Telugu Desam Party) MP and Union Minister of State, said the bill is an important achievement. He stated the capital plan is based on what the public have done for it, and should be voted for by everyone to give the state long-term stability. TDP members think making the capital clear will help things run more smoothly for the government and encourage investors.

The YSR Congress Party disagreed with how the bill was being done and left the debate. P V Midhun Reddy, a YSRCP MP, criticised the government for trying to build a very ambitious capital when the state doesn’t have much money.

YSRCP walkout and focus on farmers, finances, and timelines

Reddy also asked about how much land is being bought for Amaravati, and why they need more when land that was bought before isn’t being used. He talked about the problems of farmers and said the bill needs to say exactly when they’ll get their money, get their developed land back, and receive the other benefits they were promised.

YSRCP members said the bill must have specific dates for the promises made to people who gave up their land, including housing and schooling for their children. Without this, they said, the bill doesn’t mean much to the families affected and there is a danger of delays, causing trouble and costs for those families.

C M Ramesh of the BJP supported the bill and strongly criticised the previous state government’s idea to have three separate capitals. He said this idea didn’t make sense and led to projects being stopped or cancelled, wasting public money and making people lose faith.

BJP counters three capitals idea and calls for continuity

Ramesh also pointed out that it’s unusual for Parliament to actually name a specific city as a state capital. He said that once Amaravati is officially the only, permanent capital in law, nobody will be able to change that decision, and this will give stability to how the government plans and spends money.

Both the BJP and TDP who support the bill say this is a fresh start to make things consistent. Having just one, permanent capital makes it easier to plan public services, build infrastructure in stages, and plan investments for the long term.

The bill itself doesn’t give any money or settle arguments about land. But it does create legal certainty. This can change how risky it seems to build things, provide utilities, and create transport links for Amaravati. This certainty may make it easier to decide the order of projects and to get contracts, but getting the money will be the biggest challenge.

Political and economic stakes for Amaravati’s revival

The requests for money from the central government and “special category” status show how much it will cost to build the capital. Roads, government buildings, houses and public services will need funding for many years. The central and state governments will need to work closely together as the state creates budgets and looks for outside investment.

Getting fair compensation and moving farmers is key to the success of the project. Clear timelines, ways to solve disagreements, and keeping track of progress can reduce difficulties and legal problems. If the government links getting money to reaching certain stages and regularly updates people on how things are going, it can help people who gave up land and companies working on the project to have more confidence.

Economically, one central capital can make public services work better and help surrounding areas to grow. But to have benefits that last, the government needs to carefully manage how they buy things, how they deal with debt, and to have realistic timelines that match what can actually be done.

The Lok Sabha approved the bill by a voice vote, and it will go to the Rajya Sabha on Thursday. If both houses of Parliament approve and the bill becomes law, Amaravati will be officially the capital of Andhra Pradesh from June 2, 2024, which will match what the state government has said and what the state assembly asked for.

What comes next

In the near future, the focus will be on deciding which projects to do first, how to get the money for them, and issues related to land. The government is expected to say what work will be done in stages, including government buildings, improving transport links and providing basic city services.

For anyone interested in Andhra Pradesh, this legal clarity is a major turning point. The next stage will show if the government can plan finances, protect the rights of farmers, and manage the work effectively to turn this legal decision into a working capital that helps everyone in the state to grow. For now, the Lok Sabha has made it clear: Amaravati is the capital, and the state must now use that certainty to build it.